Every funding event needs a new card number
| swype |
|
CARD TYPES & ISSUANCE • FUNDING MODEL
Are Swype cards reloadable?No — every Swype card is single-load and non-reloadable. Here's what that means for how you design funding flows for your end users. |
|
|
AUDIENCE B2B Clients |
FUNDING MODEL Single-load only |
TOP-UP FLOW Not supported |
Summary: all Swype cards are non-reloadable. Once the available balance is used, the card cannot be topped up or reused. Additional funds require issuing a new card — there's no reload API or top-up endpoint to build against.
| ① |
What this means for your funding model |
Each card has exactly one lifecycle: issue, fund once, spend down, done. There's no reload mechanism at any point in that lifecycle:
| ● | No top-up or reload endpoint exists in the API — don't design a flow expecting one |
| ● | A depleted card cannot be revived — it stays at zero permanently |
| ● | Additional funds for the same end user means issuing a new card, not adding to the existing one |
| ② |
Designing around single-load |
If your use case involves recurring or ongoing funding for the same end user, plan for repeated issuance rather than a reload cycle. In practice that affects:
| ● | UX copy — tell end users they're getting a new card, not a refill, to avoid support tickets when the old card number stops working |
| ● | Issuance cadence — if users need funds monthly, your integration should issue a fresh card each cycle |
| ● | Wallet provisioning — if cards are added to Apple Pay or Google Pay, end users will need to re-provision each new card issued |
| ● | Reporting — track spend per card issuance, not per end user balance, since each card is its own funding event |
|
Important Don't advertise "reload" or "top-up" language to your end users — it sets an expectation the card program can't fulfill and will generate avoidable support volume on both sides. |
Building a recurring funding flow?
Talk to us about issuance cadence and API patterns before you commit to a UX design.
Contact Support →